Project Summary

Determination of Factors that Cause Livery Flavor Development in Various Beef Muscles from the Chuck and Loin

Principle Investigator(s):
Michael Dikeman
Institution(s):
Kansas State University
Completion Date:
May 2004
Background 

One of beef’s greatest attributes is its flavor. Consumers that detect “off” or uncharacteristic flavors when consuming beef consider that to be an unfavorable eating experience. One such flavor is often described as “livery,” and has been identified primarily in top sirloin and tenderloin steaks. Any opportunity to reduce the incidence of livery flavor in beef would be considered beneficial to the industry and would help decrease the incidence of unfavorable eating experiences among consumers.   

To date, there is not a significant amount of information available about the prevalence or cause of livery flavor in beef. As a result, Kansas State University conducted a project with the following objectives:   

  1. Determine the causes of livery flavor in chuck clod (infraspinatus muscle), top sirloin (gluteus medius muscle) and tenderloin (psoas major muscle). 
  2. Identify the specific volatile compounds associated with livery flavor Determine ways to prevent livery flavor in beef steaks

Methodology
 The infraspinatus muscle from the chuck clod (IMPS/NAMP 114), the gluteus medius muscle from the sirloin (IMPS/NAMP 184) and the psoas major muscle from the loin (IMPS/NAMP 189) were obtained from A- and B-bone maturity carcasses with either low-Slight or Small marbling and with either normal pH (5.7 or less) or high pH (6.0 or higher) to evaluate factors that could cause the development of livery flavor development in cooked beef.

Table 1. Number of carcasses sampled with different maturity, marbling and pH combinations.

No. of Carcasses

Maturity

Marbling

pH

20

A

Slight

Normal

20

A

Small

Normal

20

A

Slight

High

20

B

Small

High

20

B

Slight

Normal

20

B

Small

Normal

8

B

Slight

High

12

B

Small

High

The paired boneless subprimals were vacuum packaged and aged for either seven, 14, 21 or 35 days to determine if aging time had an effect on livery flavor development and, if so, to determine if there is a specific point during aging when livery flavor develops.   

Cooked steaks were served to a trained, descriptive flavor-profile sensory panel in accordance with established protocols. Characteristics evaluated included:   

  • Beef-flavor identification 
  • Brown-roasted 
  • Bloody/serumy 
  • Metallic 
  • Livery 
  • Rancid 
  • Sour flavors   

Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, high-pressure liquid chromatography and 2- thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) were used to analyze for volatile compounds both in livery flavored and non-livery flavored samples, for fatty acid concentration and lipid oxidation. Samples of beef liver were ground and used for gas chromatography determination of volatile compounds responsible for the liver flavor characteristics. 

Findings 

The three-way interaction for livery flavor suggested that neither marbling level, maturity or aging time have a consistent effect on livery flavor development. There was somewhat of a trend, however for muscles from carcasses with Small marbling to have less livery flavor and those from carcasses with B-maturity to have more livery flavor.   

Both the gluteus medius and psoas major muscles had a statistically significant more intense livery flavor than the infraspinatus, but the numerical differences on the 15-point scale were small enough to probably be of little practical significance.   

The incidence of livery flavor in this study was quite low. There were numerous statistical interactions among traits, which made it difficult for the researchers to make clear conclusions. In general, marbling and aging time had little direct effect on livery flavor or any of the laboratory analyses. Muscles from high pH, or dark cutting carcasses had less beef flavor identification than those with normal pH.   

Sixteen volatile compounds were identified that were different between samples that were identified by taste panelists as being livery in flavor and those that were not. Chemical analyses revealed that myoglobin content was also positively related to livery flavor.   

Following is a table that contains a list of volatile compounds that were frequently different in concentration between samples that were found to have a livery flavor by the trained flavor profile panel and those that were not. Thirteen of the volatile compounds were higher in the samples that had livery flavor, whereas three were higher in the samples that were not livery in flavor.  

Table 2. Volatile compounds found to be different in livery samples versus non-livery samples.

Retention Time

Compound Name

2.34

Hexanal

3.89

Butane, 1-(ethenylthio)

6.15

dl-Limonene

7.04

2-Octanel

8.10

Nonanal

9.68

2-Nonenal, (E)-

12.43

2-Decenal-[E]

13.38

2,4-Decadienal, (E, E)

13.99

2,4-Decadienal

15.17

2-Undecenal

16.28

Trans-2-Undecen-1-ol; or Dodecanol

18.88

Pheno, 2,6-bis (1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-methyl-

21.03

Pentan-1,3-Dioldiisobutyrate, 2,2,4-tryme

23.66

Tetradecanal

25.90

Octadecanal or Hexadecanal

30.20

Octadecanal

Implications   

Based on this project, the researchers concluded that livery flavor in beef is a complex trait that results from the interactions of various factors. Some of the compounds found to be different among the livery versus non-livery samples have been identified previously in the longissimus muscle according to a 2002 report that appeared in the Journal of Food Science. Further research is needed to study the interactions of volatile compounds, myoglobin, total iron content and marination ingredients and their effect on the development of livery flavor in beef.